Friday, March 02, 2007

Lines in the Sand
















I ran across this quote the other day. It is absolutely fantastic! At least to me. Guess which president said this. I'll reveal in the next post who said it.

"Conservatism, at its very best, draws lines that should not be crossed. Progressivism, at its very best, breaks down barriers that are no longer needed, or should never have been erected in the first place."


I think it speaks volumes. Conservatives are those who try to identify what is important and what should never be forgotten. They identify what is fundamental, what is foundational, and what all of us should agree to. They draw a line in the sand and demand that we never cross it. Doesn't mean that everything conservatives identify as important is right, this is just the reality of the situation.

Progressives challenge those fundamentals. They dare to cross the lines in the sand that conservatives have drawn. They challenge what has become central to us. Sometimes the practical becomes identified as fundamental. For instance, four-part harmony is certainly singing without instrumental accompaniment but that particular type of singing isn't central to Scripture. In some instances progressives help us to rethink our understanding of what is truly fundamental. We should also realize that progressives, as conservatives, are not always right. This is just reality.

Sometimes what the conservatives identify as important needs to be shown that we no longer need such. Perhaps we could use playing cards as an illustration. I don't know all the reasons why cards were outlawed by churches (I suspect that it may have something to do with gamblers who used them in the saloons in the West). Some conservatives probably still hold on to this one. At one time not using cards had validity and no one should have used them. With time and other cultural changes the reasons no longer exist so cards can be a part of a family's entertainment.

Even though dialogue between conservatives and progressives is never easy, it is a necessary one. Both sides benefit (if they can stay at the negotiating table long enough) from the discussion. But both sides need to give grace to the other side. Dogmatism exists on both sides of the aisle. Judgmentalism exists on both sides of the aisle. I don't know how to accomplish keeping both sides talking but I just know they should.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dad, I love how you write. I would love it if we could stay at the negotiating table long enough to benefit everyone too. I like your sum-up of both sides, listing the strengths & weaknesses of both. Sometimes I wonder where I fall?? Pretty sure closer to one side than the other, but not sure how close. I guess it doesn't matter.

Neva said...

Bob
What a great post--encouraging communication between the saints, what a novel idea, :)
It is too bad we cannot learn to get along and love each other, talking out our differences in love with eternity in view.
Loved the post
Peace and prayers
Neva
PS My daughter in law met the Steeds last Sunday. They all have the flu today so not sure if they will be there tomorrow.

TREY MORGAN said...

Bob... I hear you on this post. If we could just get everyone to overlook the unimportant things and focus on that IS important.

Wow, what a difference it would make.